Review Process
Founder-led review
HinduAI is founder-led. Public content, trust pages, and educational material may be drafted or assisted by AI tools, but responsibility for what is published remains human. That includes deciding when a page needs revision, simplification, correction, or removal.
When pages may be updated
Pages may be revised when there is a factual issue, unclear wording, an outdated date, a better explanation, or a user concern about tone or sensitivity. Festival pages may also need updates when calendar timing, observance details, or year references change.
Role of feedback
User feedback is important for spotting unclear claims, weak explanations, and places where wording may feel careless or too absolute. HinduAI welcomes respectful feedback that helps improve accuracy, humility, and usefulness.
Limits of review
HinduAI does not claim that every page has been reviewed by scholars, priests, or institutions. Review is ongoing and practical, not presented as a formal certification system. That is why users should still apply judgment and verify local ritual, Panchang, or high-stakes matters independently.
Correction mindset
The goal of review is not only to fix mistakes but also to improve trust. When HinduAI updates a page, the intention should be to make it more accurate, more respectful, and easier to use responsibly.